RSS LJ

May 14, 2005

Voice-prompt menus fucking suck (, )

by fluffy at 1:14 PM
Back in the good old days of number-prompt menus, you could access most systems without talking and disturbing others (in an office or while on a cellphone), and any talking would be limited to actually speaking with a real person. With frequently-accessed systems, you could remember a quick series of keys to get to frequently-accessed menus, and also interrupt the speaker by simply making a selection when you know which one needs to be made. If you knew you just needed to speak with a live operator, you could just press 0 and immediately be put into the queue.

But every single system is switching to these horrible voice-prompt systems, where they direct you to *say* what you're looking for. This is broken for many reasons:

  • You usually can't speak your selection until the prompt is finished (and often the prompt is quite verbose)
  • It always asks for confirmation of your selection, usually with a stupidly chatty "Let me make sure I understood you right" ramble
  • Any background noise or speech problem confuses the heck out of it (heaven forbid that anyone with a cold or laryngitis or whatever tries to use the system)
  • Sentence fragments spoken in a loud, clear voice tend to disturb/annoy other people in an environment much more than actual conversations
One particularly bad offender is T-Mobile. Until a month ago they used standard number menus, which I had grown quite accustomed to, and found to be very convenient. In order to pay my bill, I would just call 611, enter a few easy-to-remember selections, whip out my credit card and punch that in, and be done with it. But then they switched to the worst voice-prompt menus I've ever tried to use, right in the middle of a horrible cold which made it impossible for me to actually navigate the menus without it "helpfully" just putting me in the CSR queue. I never even got to the point where I knew whether it would even still let me enter the credit card information via keypad, either - for all I know it might even require you to speak that out loud as well, letting everyone around me know my credit card information!

So, now when I remember that it's time to pay my bill, I can't just whip out my phone and take care of it in about a minute; instead, I have to wait until I get home, keep remembering about the pending bill payment, and then pay it online with their web interface (which tries to sell me new rate plans and useless services that I don't want or need before I can get to the bill payment).

I'll probably just switch to paying my T-Mobile bill via my third-party bill-payment service, which just sends them a check, meaning that now they need a human to manually process a piece of paper sent via the postal service, raising their expenses and therefore my costs, instead of allowing their electronic payment processing to do it all automatically.

Nice work, T-Mobile.

Comments

#5485 05/14/2005 09:47 pm
Frankly, I feel kind of insulted by these ridiculous voice recognition things. Apparently the companies that use them think that customers care more about stupid new technology than user-friendliness, ease of use and convenience.

I can't wait until this trend phases out. I hate it when people think that any "futuristic" technology is inherently good.
#5486 05/15/2005 01:39 am
Well... personally, I think voice-activated systems are okay, AS LONG AS it's just a matter of "press or say 1". I haven't yet run into any that insisted on your saying something, but I certainly wouldn't like it if I did. Particularly if it were an especially picky system.
#5487 05/15/2005 01:55 am
Really? I called Toys R Us around Christmas last year to check and see what the balance was on a gift card I got, but it was an automated thing that insisted it could understand me if I spoke in NATURAL English. That is, you're supposed to tell it exactly what you want to do as if you were talking to a person.

It was really bizarre, and caught me totally off-guard. I wasn't sure what to do, so after a long pause while I wondered if it was serious, and a little hemming and hawing, I just said: "I need to check the balance on my gift card." I felt REALLY silly talking to the machine.

It said it didn't understand and asked me to repeat myself, so I reduced it down to the key points of what I wanted, GIFT CARD BALANCE and sure enough it redirected me to the right thing. It was weird, though.
#5488 05/15/2005 04:25 am
zetawoof
Well... personally, I think voice-activated systems are okay, AS LONG AS it's just a matter of "press or say 1". I haven't yet run into any that insisted on your saying something, but I certainly wouldn't like it if I did. Particularly if it were an especially picky system.


Those ones are okay, mostly, except they get confused by coughing and background noise. But FedEx and T-Mobile and so on use the "natural speech" ones that go ON AND ON about how "I recognize natural speech! Really! TRY ME OUT! I'm so cool!" and then end up fucking sucking.
#5495 05/15/2005 11:54 am
Another reason why these "natural language" systems suck is that not everybody speaks perfect English. God forbid that you have an accent or a speech disability, because you'll end up in voice system hell!

"I'm sorry, I couldn't understand your selection" ad infinitum Sad
#5496 05/15/2005 10:08 pm
"For Animal from the Muppet Show, press or say '11'."
#5497 05/16/2005 07:44 am
oh, man, i hate those things. yes, most of the time they don't understand if you start pushing buttons. when i get one i usually swear at it and when it says "sorry i don't understand" i feel a little bit better. heh. anyway, i've found that you can sometimes still just push random buttons and eventually the crappy thing gives up and lets you talk to a person, which is what i probably wanted anyway. sucks if you actually want the push-button system, though. i was annoyed at those too, until the voice systems came on and annoyed me even more.
-bill
#5502 05/16/2005 05:52 pm
I had to deal with one of those recently to get a new phone service connected. The first time I came across one, I had to hang up because the idea made me laugh. I called back and eventually managed to persuade it to send me to someone who could handle a phone disconnection. Yesterday's second encounter was a lot smoother: I was pleasantly surprised when it got my phone number right first go.

(Of course, the first thing the real live operator asked for was my phone number. She said it was "just checking"; though I don't know if that's because they're being privacy-conscious about the risk of mixing up callers, or because the system is error prone, or if it's just what they're told to say when the damn system takes longer to pass the info along than it would to ask the caller again.)

But I don't have to deal with this crap just to pay a bill. Don't you guys have Internet banking based bill payment systems over there?
#5505 05/17/2005 11:18 am
We do, and I have one, it's just that for some reason I like the idea of using my phone to pay for itself. Very Happy