Another way top-posted replies suck (rant)
by at 11:31 AM
Not only does it make people stupid, but it makes people do stupid things to work around the problem of not having inline replies. Namely, if people want to reply to an email point-by-point, they end up doing silly things like changing the color of their text in the reply. If those point-by-point replies further require point-by-point responses, then you end up with a cavalcade of rainbow colors or font changes or the like which quickly becomes difficult to keep track of and becomes completely incomprehensible if someone does the unthinkable and changes the message formatting to plain text (or tries reading it on a text-only client, for that matter).
Reply markers exist for a reason, Microsoft.
(And yes I realize it's possible to turn them on in Outlook but it's not the default, and in particular our project manager doesn't set it up. Anyway, top-posted replies with per-line reply markers are doubly-stupid since now you've got a workaround for a workaround for something which was never a problem to begin with.)
Comments
Yeah, this is really irritating me with Outlook too. It also replaces the > markers with some sort of stupid vertical line, which does not edit like a normal line would. Gah! Annoying Microsoft, deciding how we want things to look!!
-bill
Mail.app sometimes does some really weird things when you copy/paste quoted text, though. (The text changes back to the default color, and sometimes the line spacing gets screwed up.)
Sometimes I wish someone'd write a good alternative mail client for OS X.