RSS LJ

March 11, 2009

Thoughts about the new Shuffle ()

by fluffy at 12:19 PM
So, of course people are a bit atwitter with the news of the new iPod Shuffle. Personally I'm surprised it took them this long to add VoiceOver to the Shuffle. The actual device's form factor is too small; I have a hard enough time keeping track of my many 4GB USB thumb drives which are much larger than it. And it doesn't seem like it was actually necessary for them to remove the controls from the device itself, considering how small the buttons are on the inline headphone controller thing. I expect to see third-party "sleeves" for it soon which bulk up the device and add playback controls back to the device itself (via the headphone jack).

Meanwhile, the main odd thing about VoiceOver appears to have all the text pre-rendered by the sync PC; on the overview video, they mention that the voice is different for Macs and PCs. Considering the old 68K Macs had a speech synthesizer in a tiny amount of space and CPU, it's a bit surprising that they'd add time to the sync process instead of just putting the speech synthesizer on the player itself (not to mention all the storage space that likely wastes). Very odd.

The less-odd but still pretty odd thing is that they're making a big deal about how it's "the first mp3 player that talks to you" even though the current iPod Nano and Classic already did that.

Comments

#11830 03/12/2009 05:56 am
Voiceover being different on Mac vs. PC is probably a feature that Steve Jobs specifically wanted, for the smug factor.
#11831 03/12/2009 08:17 am
I wonder if it's maybe more like they couldn't fit a sufficiently good voice engine on the device. I guess the current OSX voice engine is pretty immense - the "Alex" voice appears to be a whopping 685MB large.

The older speech engines are anywhere from 4K to 29MB, but they also sound pretty assy. Actually the "Windows" voice sounds like Vicki (the best of the old engines, at 29MB) so they probably just bundle that along with iTunes now.