Re: Testing a thing, pay no mind
In reply to: Re: Testing a thing, pay no mind
Testing the other side
Likes and replies in the IndieWeb
In reply to: Re: Testing a thing, pay no mind
Testing the other side
Looks like dougbeal is trying to restart the Homebrew Website Club Seattle chapter. This is my “definitely maybe” RSVP. :)
I’m seeing what happens when I generate a webmention to a protocol-relative URL.
Also seeing if webmention.io preserves fragments.
In reply to: Re: Webmention support for static sites
Oh, yes, and it’s great; I just wanted something much simpler. I took a look at it, but some requirements (like my ATOM feed needing WebSub compliance, which I didn’t know the meaning of, and other things that I sincerely didn’t understand) made me wish for something more straightforward. I run my script on the same computer that stores my
atom.xmlfile, so I have no need for download support and/or caching further than knowing the timestamp of the file.
Ah, just to clarify, WebSub isn’t required, it’s just supported — it’s just one of the things Pushl supports. I hadn’t considered offline support as something that someone might want, so for that use case Gruta is definitely a better choice.
I’ll consider making it more clear what’s optional in the documentation, since I can see that being a point of confusion!
In reply to: Re: Webmention support for static sites
I’ve written a script to add Webmention support for static sites. It’s available from:
That’s cool, but did you happen to see my tool Pushl that does the same thing? It has a few other features like feed autodiscovery, WebSub, and RFC5005 archive backfilling. And it’s pip-installable!
In reply to: ActivityPub test
Just testing to see if fed.brid.gy is working now. Hopefully helps with issue 46.